Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 00:13

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
'Just one mutation away', COVID-19-like virus in China could spark outbreak: Study - WION
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Is dating in college necessary? Why and why not?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Full-screen Xbox handheld UI is coming to all Windows PCs “starting next year” - Ars Technica
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Where should Jac Caglianone hit in the Royals order? - Royals Review
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
Shock as Republican plan will raise Americans' utility bills by hundreds a year - Alternet
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Let’s just make it real clear:
What is the cost of living in Sweden as a family?
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Kristopher Mohamed needs help to fund cancer fight - Trinidad and Tobago Newsday